Skip to main content

Thomas v. People

Citations

  • 803 P.2d 144
  • 14 Brief Times Rptr. 1351
  • 1990 Colo. LEXIS 660
  • 1990 WL 149775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing confrontation right implications of previously recorded video testimony that was preserved pursuant to the statute allowing videotape depositions of child sexual assault victims, section 18-3-413, C.R.S. 2015
  • “[T]he jurors should be instructed that in order to convict the defendant they must either unanimously agree that the defendant committed the same act or acts or that the defendant committed all of the acts” alleged.
  • video of deposition of child sexual assault victim was reliable and therefore admissible when child was questioned (1) by one therapist approved by the prosecution and one therapist approved by the defense, (2) under oath, and (3
  • reviewing for constitutional harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohr, Vollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Thomas v. People

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.