Skip to main content

Thomas v. Bailey

Citations

  • 611 P.2d 536
  • 1980 Alas. LEXIS 685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that public interest litigators should not be compensated at the rate provided for representing indigents, but should instead be fully compensated \at a reasonable rate\ to encourage public interest litigation
  • stating that public interest litigators should not be compensated at the rate provided for representing indigents, but should instead be fully compensated \at a reasonable rate\ to encourage public interest litigation
  • finding public interest plaintiff entitled to lodestar fees, but not risk-enhanced fees
  • observing in public interest litigation that “an upward adjustment” in fees may be justified when “pertinent law is unclear at the outset of a case” (quoting Note, Court Awarded Attorney’s Fees and Equal Access to the Courts, 122 U. PA. L. REV. 636, 710-11 (1974))
  • Trustees for Alaska challenging constitutionality of voter initiative qualifies as public interest litigant
  • Trustees for Alaska challenging constitutionality of voter initiative qualifies as public interest litigant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Rabinow-Itz, Connor, Burke, Dimond, Mathews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.