Skip to main content

Gilbert v. State

Citations

  • 526 P.2d 1131
  • 1974 Alas. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \ilt is an abuse of discretion to award attorney's fees against a losing party who has in good faith raised an issue of genuine public interest before the courts\
  • holding that a potential candidate for state senate who lost in his challenge to residency requirements was a public interest litigant, despite the court’s findings that the effect on voters’ choice of candidates was “more hypothetical than real” and only “slight”
  • holding it was abuse of discretion to award attorney's fees to the State against losing party who in good faith raised question of genuine public interest before the court
  • stating that a durational residency requirement for state office ―assur[es] that those who govern are acquainted with the conditions, problems, and needs of those who are governed‖
  • explaining that \[i]t is not the purpose of Rule 82 to penalize a party for litigating a good faith claim but rather partially to compensate the prevailing party where such compensation is justified\
  • explaining that ”[i]t is not the purpose of Rule 82 to penalize a party for litigating a good faith claim but rather partially to compensate the prevailing party where such compensation is justified”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Erwin, Boochever, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.