Thomas Prousalis, Jr. v. Charles Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a § 2241 petition could be considered only if relief under § 2255 was “inadequate or ineffective” (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moya v. United States Department of Homeland Security
  Second Circuit· 2020-09-15· cited 40×
• United States v. Raymond Surratt, Jr.
  Fourth Circuit· 2015-07-31· cited 25×
• Whitaker v. Dunbar
  E.D. North Carolina· 2014-09-02

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Lanier
  Supreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
• Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,963×
• Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
• Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,685×
• Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
  Supreme Court· 1971-11-08· cited 948×
• Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-01-15· cited 943×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1963-12-09· cited 780×
• King v. St. Vincent's Hospital
  Supreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 703×
• Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-13· cited 389×
• United States v. Ashley
  Fourth Circuit· 2010-06-01· cited 134×
• United States v. David Richeson, United States of America v. Mahmood Ul-Hassan
  Fourth Circuit· 1987-07-23· cited 31×
• Smith v. Reagan
  Fourth Circuit· 1988-04-18· cited 19×