Thomas J. Lanigan v. Michael T. Maloney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a habeas petitioner’s claims had been exhausted, even though the petitioner reformulated his claim in federal court by \add[ing] detail\ because the petitioner’s \claim to both the state and federal courts depend[ed] upon resolution of the same question\
• context of Webster charge lessens the potential for any harmful inferences to be drawn by jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).