Thoman Engineers, Inc. v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an appellate court may consider an argument that is not compliant with the predecessor to Rule 28(a)(10) when the argument \has been raised in a manner which is fair to all concerned\
• explaining that, even when an appellant fails to comply with Rule 28(a)(10), an appellate court may consider an argument when the argument “has been raised in a manner which is fair to all concerned”
• indicating that this court will consider the merits of an appeal despite an appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 28, Ala. R.App. P., if the appellee adequately responds to the issue in his brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).