Bishop v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an appellate court may consider an argument that is not compliant with Rule 28(a)(10) when the appellee adequately responds to the issues raised by the appellant in brief despite the noncompliance
• explaining that an appellate court may consider an argument that is not compliant with Rule 28(a)(10) when the appellee adequately responds to the issues raised by the appellant in brief despite the noncompliance
• indicating that this court will consider the merits of an argument despite noncompliance with Rule 28, Ala. R. App. P., in cases in which the appellee responded adequately to the issue
• stating that, if the appellee adequately responds to the issues raised by the appellant in its brief, the court can consider the merits of the case despite the appellant's failure to comply with Rule 28, in light of the preference for deciding cases on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).