Skip to main content
· 7/9/1958

Thigpen v. Skousen & Hise

Citations

  • 327 P.2d 802
  • 64 N.M. 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting Restatement Sections 519 and 520 and noting blasting is one type of ultrahazardous activity
  • “Blasting is ultrahazardous because high explosives are used and it is impossible to predict with certainty the extent or severity of its consequences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sadler, Lujan, McGhee, Compton, Shillinglaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.