First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• marketing of Panogen was matter of common usage where “grain treatment had wide acceptance and use throughout the country at the time of the ... incident”
• finding grain treatment was “common usage” because it “had wide acceptance and use throughout the country” at the time of the incident
• marketing highly toxic chemical commonly used as a seed disinfectant is not ultrahazardous
• applying the first Restatement and finding that treating seed grain with a highly toxic disinfectant is not an ultrahazardous activity because adequate warnings not to feed the grain to livestock would eliminate the danger
• if middleman-processor had constructive knowledge of the danger, then the seller owed no duty to the ultimate consumer
• jury question whether manufacturer had duty to warn consumers directly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).