Skip to main content
· 8/28/1997

Thigpen v. Cheminova, Inc.

Citations

  • 992 F. Supp. 864
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21763
  • 1997 WL 827794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Court thus finds that, although the record reflects that [two defendants] have [now] been served, the Court need not take notice of that fact to find that this action was not removable from state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gex

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.