The State v. Gunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]hether an emergency exists and remains ongoing is a highly context-dependent inquiry.\ (punctuation, footnote and emphasis omitted)
• “[W]hether an emergency exists and remains ongoing is a highly context-dependent inquiry.” (punctuation, footnote and emphasis omitted)
• “whether an emergency exists and remains ongoing is a highly context-dependent inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCord v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-03-04· cited 29×
• Danley v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-06-23· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Davis v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
• Michigan v. Bryant
  Supreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
• Brittain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-17· cited 57×
• Pitts v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-02-27· cited 40×
• People v. Conyers
  New York Supreme Court· 2004-05-10· cited 25×
• Philpot v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-22· cited 12×
• Owens v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-04· cited 10×
• State v. Bratschi
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-15· cited 7×