The People v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]lthough it would have been proper for the judge [at the postconviction evidentiary hearing] to refer to the evidence at the original trial, he was not required to do so, and his failure to read the evidence did not constitute prejudicial error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Bell
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-11-30· cited 86×
• The PEOPLE v. Figgers
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-01-23· cited 72×
• The PEOPLE v. Clay
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-02-01· cited 25×
• People v. Merrill
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-10-28· cited 18×
• People v. Neal
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-04· cited 10×
• People v. Van Hyning
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-06-23· cited 8×
• People v. Dayani
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-12-19· cited 5×
• People v. Concil
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-02-27· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The PEOPLE v. Allen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1959-05-22· cited 87×
• The People v. Nelson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1959-11-18· cited 33×