The PEOPLE v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• res judicata does not preclude consideration in post-conviction proceedings of “constitutional questions which, by their nature, depended upon facts not found in the record”
• res judicata does not preclude consideration in post-conviction proceedings of “constitutional questions which, by their nature, depended upon facts not found in the record”
• res judicata does not preclude consideration in post- conviction proceedings of “constitutional questions which, by their nature, depended upon facts 22 1-21-0919 not found in the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).