Skip to main content
· 3/20/2003

The Florida Bar v. Wohl

Citations

  • 842 So. 2d 811
  • 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 251
  • 2003 Fla. LEXIS 391
  • 2003 WL 1339163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting recommended reprimand, imposing 90 day suspension, and stating that \[o]ffering financial inducements to a fact witness is extremely serious misconduct\
  • \[T]empting a witness to color testimony is an evil that should be avoided.\
  • “[T]empting a witness to color testimony is an evil that should be avoided.”
  • “We condemn the practice of compensating fact witnesses in violation of rule 4-3.4(b) in no uncertain terms.”
  • \We condemn the practice of compensating fact witnesses in violation of rule 4-3.4(b) in no uncertain terms.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.