The Florida Bar v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Attorneys have a solemn responsibility to assure that not even the taint of impropriety exists as to the procurement of testimony before courts of justice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Miranda
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-09-27· cited 46×
• Golden Door Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters Non-Marine Ass'n
  S.D. Florida· 1994-10-17· cited 29×
• The Florida Bar v. Lipman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-10-02· cited 19×
• The Florida Bar v. Ross
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-12-24· cited 14×
• The Florida Bar v. Wohl
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-03-20· cited 11×
• Just in Case Business Lighthouse, LLC v. Murray
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-07-18· cited 9×
• The Florida Bar v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-18· cited 5×
• Trial Practices, Inc. v. Hahn Loeser & Parks, LLP, etc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-12-28· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The Florida Bar v. Hoffer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-05-01· cited 10×
• The Florida Bar v. Fields
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-01-23· cited 5×

Other cases named The Florida Bar v. Jackson

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• The Florida Bar v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-18· cited 5×
• The Florida Bar v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-04-17