Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Lohrmann test “is a fair balance between the needs of plaintiffs (recognizing the difficulty of proving contact) and defendants (protecting against liability predicated on guesswork)”
• plaintiff must “produce evidence from which a fact-finder, after assessing the proof of frequency and intensity of plaintiff’s contacts with a particular manufacturer’s friable asbestos, could reasonably infer toxic exposure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).