Third Circuit· 7/17/1967
Texaco, Inc. v. Borda
Citations
- 383 F.2d 607
- 11 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 782
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying mandamus relief from a discovery stay except allowing the deposition of the seventy-one year old plaintiff
- denying mandamus relief from a discovery stay except allowing the deposition of the seventy-one year old plaintiff
- directing district court to allow Rule 27(a) deposition because “it would be ignoring the facts of life to say that a 71-year old witness will be available, to give his deposition or testimony, at an undeterminable future date”
- concerns over advanced age of a witness could be allevi- ated by permitting a deposition to preserve testimony, and did not prevent a stay
- court permitted Rule 27(a) deposition of 71-year old witness in suit that had been stayed pending resolution of parallel criminal prosecution
- order denying leave to depose 71-year-old witness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Body, Kalodner, Seitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lombard's, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. And Chesebrough-Pond's Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1985-02-21· cited 221×
- Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-07-10· cited 145×
- Richard A. Ash, on Behalf of Himself, and on Behalf of Bethelehem Steel Corporation v. Stewart S. Cort, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, NominalThird Circuit· 1975-02-26· cited 86×
- First Jersey Securities, Inc. v. BergenThird Circuit· 1979-08-29· cited 81×
- Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.Third Circuit· 1975-01-24· cited 76×
- Rad Services, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyThird Circuit· 1986-12-30· cited 70×
- Petition of Hall by and Through HallSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-02-05· cited 69×
- Frederick L. v. ThomasThird Circuit· 1978-06-12· cited 45×
- The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United States of America and the Internal Revenue ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1995-10-27· cited 41×
- United States v. Mellon Bank, N. A., and Milton F. Meissner, IntervenorThird Circuit· 1976-12-07· cited 36×
- John J. Donnelly v. Honorable Barrington D. ParkerD.C. Circuit· 1973-08-21· cited 31×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1980-11-17· cited 29×
- In re BolandDistrict of Columbia· 1978-08-21· cited 25×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Chilcott Portfolio Management, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1983-07-25· cited 23×
- De Vita v. SillsThird Circuit· 1970-03-09· cited 23×
- Texaco, Inc. v. BordaThird Circuit· 1967-07-17· cited 21×
- Maheu v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark, Dept. No. 6Nevada Supreme Court· 1972-01-28· cited 18×
- Inverultra, S.A. v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court· 2014-12-18· cited 18×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1980-07-16· cited 18×
- United States v. Gieger Transfer Service, Inc.S.D. Mississippi· 1997-08-18· cited 17×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 5,442×
- Pet Milk Company v. Willis W. Ritter, Carnation Company v. Willis W. Ritter, Continental Baking Company v. Willis W. RitterTenth Circuit· 1963-10-21· cited 134×
- Rapp v. Van DusenThird Circuit· 1965-08-10· cited 88×
- Elsa W. De Wagenknecht v. Mrs. Hugo StinnesD.C. Circuit· 1957-11-27· cited 39×
Other cases named Texaco, Inc. v. Borda
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.