Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 7/17/1967

Texaco, Inc. v. Borda

Citations

  • 383 F.2d 607
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying mandamus relief from a discovery stay except allowing the deposition of the seventy-one year old plaintiff
  • denying mandamus relief from a discovery stay except allowing the deposition of the seventy-one year old plaintiff
  • directing district court to allow Rule 27(a) deposition because “it would be ignoring the facts of life to say that a 71-year old witness will be available, to give his deposition or testimony, at an undeterminable future date”
  • concerns over advanced age of a witness could be allevi- ated by permitting a deposition to preserve testimony, and did not prevent a stay
  • court permitted Rule 27(a) deposition of 71-year old witness in suit that had been stayed pending resolution of parallel criminal prosecution
  • order denying leave to depose 71-year-old witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Body, Kalodner, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Texaco, Inc. v. Borda

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.