Rad Services, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting the jury to draw an adverse inference when the record was “replete with circumstantial evidence of” the witnesses’ “involvement with the alleged plan”
• “the admission as evidence of a non-party’s invocation of the [f]ifth [a]mendment privilege is not per se reversible error”
• “admission of evidence of a non-party’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege is not per se reversible error.”
• same policies underlying the privilege that permit an adverse inference against a party likewise allow an adverse inference against a non-party
• past or present corporate employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).