Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 10/4/1991
Terren v. Butler
Citations
- 134 N.H. 635
- 597 A.2d 69
- 1991 N.H. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the lower court’s decision to allow veil-piercing upon a finding that corporate principals “diverged] corporate assets to their benefit when substantial notice of claims [against the corporation] were outstanding”
- “New Hampshire courts do not ‘hesitate to disregard the fiction of the corporation’ when circumstances would lead to an inequitable result.” (brackets omitted
- “New Hampshire courts do not ‘hesitate to disregard the fiction of the corporation’ when circumstances would lead to an inequitable result.” (brackets omitted
- that defendants were sole officers and shareholders of corporation and commingled corporate and personal assets was significant factor in decision to pierce corporate veil
- substantial depletion of corporate assets after learning about potential claim
- explaining the piercing the corporate veil doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martinez v. PetrenkoFirst Circuit· 2015-07-06· cited 139×
- LaMontagne Builders, Inc. v. Bowman Brook Purchase GroupSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-11-24· cited 37×
- Norwood Group, Inc. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-07-24· cited 26×
- Dinco v. Dylex LimitedFirst Circuit· 1997-04-25· cited 17×
- Bielagus v. EMRE of New Hampshire Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-07-01· cited 16×
- Unit Owners Ass'n of Summit Vista Lot 8 Condominium v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-05-16· cited 15×
- Gautschi v. Auto Body Discount Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-03-28· cited 13×
- GE Mobile Water, Inc. v. Red Desert Reclamation, LLCD. New Hampshire· 2014-03-17· cited 12×
- Michnovez v. Blair, LLCD. New Hampshire· 2011-06-13· cited 10×
- United States v. KattarD. New Hampshire· 1999-08-19· cited 9×
- Charley Toppino & Sons v. SEAWATCHSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-10· cited 6×
- SALTPONDS CONDO. v. Walbridge Aldinger Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-30· cited 5×
- Stewart v. StewartFirst Circuit· 2018-11-01· cited 4×
- In Re MartinD. New Hampshire· 2008-06-16· cited 3×
- Christina DiIorio-Sterling v. P Capstone Management, LLC, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2022-03-31· cited 1×
- Fujifilm North America Corporation et al. v. P M&R Printing Equipment, Inc. et al.D. New Hampshire· 2021-02-24· cited 1×
- Sheppard v. River Valley Fitness One, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2002-01-24· cited 1×
- Surge Resources v. Barrow Group et alD. New Hampshire· 2003-03-12· cited 1×
- Petition of Whitman Operating Co., LLC d/b/a Camp Walt Whitman & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2021-09-22
- U.S. v. KattarD. New Hampshire· 1999-08-19
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-08-29· cited 143×
- Ca 79-3053 Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics CorporationThird Circuit· 1979-08-08· cited 134×
- Lempke v. DagenaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-08-08· cited 49×
- Austin Co. v. Vaughn Building Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1982-10-27· cited 47×
- Druding v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-09-10· cited 32×
- C & M Realty Trust v. WiedenkellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-08-01· cited 23×
- Peter R. Previte, Inc. v. McAllister Florist, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1973-10-31· cited 22×
- Ashland Lumber Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-05-31· cited 18×
- Directors Guild of America, Inc. v. Garrison Productions, Inc.S.D. New York· 1990-03-30· cited 14×
- Town of Nottingham v. BonserSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-12-09· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.