Skip to main content

Harkeem v. Adams

Citations

  • 117 N.H. 687
  • 377 A.2d 617
  • 1977 N.H. LEXIS 410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff’s right to unemployment compensation is clearly defined right by statute
  • agency determination of ineligibility for unemployment benefits overturned by court; agency thereafter “used the same [rejected] rationale to disqualify the appellant from benefits”
  • fees may be awarded when an individual is forced to seek judicial assistance to secure a clearly defined and established right
  • unemployment compensation applicant forced to litigate when state agency denied benefits for reasons previously rejected by superior court
  • litigation conducted in “bad faith” may justify award of counsel fees
  • “Where an individual is forced to seek judicial assistance to secure a clearly defined and established right, which should have been freely enjoyed without such intervention, an award of counsel fees on the basis of bad faith is appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bois, Douglas, Others

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.