District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/8/1989
Temple v. Temple
Citations
- 539 So. 2d 564
- 1989 WL 20699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prejudgment interest cannot be assessed because attorney's fees do not constitute liquidated damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Quality Engineered Installation, Inc. v. Higley South, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-03-28· cited 76×
- Boulis v. Florida Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-01· cited 21×
- Ross v. BandiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-29· cited 16×
- Higley South v. Quality Engineered Inst.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-05· cited 7×
- Kendall Racquetball Inv. v. GREEN COMP.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-03· cited 5×
- Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-23· cited 3×
- Miller v. Transflorida BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-28· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-03· cited 406×
- Novack v. NovackSupreme Court of Florida· 1968-05-08· cited 16×
- Temple v. TempleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-27· cited 10×
- Grasland v. Taylor Woodrow Homes Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-05· cited 9×
- NCN Elec., Inc. v. LetoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-23· cited 8×
- First Am. Bank v. Windjammer Time SharingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.