Teachers' Retirement System v. Aidinoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an entity “is fairly charged with the knowledge and conduct of its controlling persons” since “it is the general rule that knowledge of an 46 officer or director of a corporation will be imputed to the corporation”
• applying separate accrual theory where the challenged contract was entered into thirty years before the complaint was filed, where the defendant directors renewed the contract each year
• “[I]t is the general rule that knowledge of an officer or director of a corporation will be imputed to the corporation”
• “[I]t is the general rule that knowledge of an officer or director of a corporation will be imputed to the corporation”
• “[I]t is the general rule that knowledge of an officer or director of a corporation will be imputed to the corporation”
• \[I]t is the general rule that knowledge of an officer or director of a corporation will be imputed to the corporation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).