Skip to main content

Tazian v. Cline

Citations

  • 686 N.E.2d 95
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 150
  • 1997 WL 596667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that consideration of $500 along with consideration of the benefits anticipated from the railroad when constructed was more than nominal, although not conclusive of the intent of the parties
  • construing a deed executed in 1873 and not mentioning the railroad company’s charter
  • “[T]his deed does not describe the interest conveyed as a railroad right of way nor does the language limit the conveyance as for railroad purposes or railroad uses.”
  • “When attempting to ascertain the intent of the parties to a conveyance to a railroad, appellate courts of this state look at the consideration paid to the grantee railroad.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Selby, Dickson, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Tazian v. Cline

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.