Clark v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the title may provide additional evidence of intent where the language of the deed is unclear”
• remarking that, “in construing a deed,” courts in Indiana “consider[] the instrument relative to the statutes in effect at the time of the conveyance”
• remarking that, “in construing a deed,” courts in Indiana “consider[] the instrument relative to the statutes in effect at the time of the conveyance”
• remarking that “[t]he property statute in effect at the time of conveyance” was enacted in 1852 and not mentioning the railroad company’s charter
• remarking that “[t]he property statute in effect at the time of conveyance” was enacted in 1852 and not mentioning the railroad company’s charter
• remarking that, “in construing a deed,” courts in Indiana “consider[] the instrument relative to the statutes in effect at the time of the conveyance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).