Taylor v. State
Citations
- 74 Miss. 544
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law. Indictment. Motion in arrest. Code 1893-, $1341.</p> <p>Notwithstanding the provisions of code 1893, ?¿?¿ 1341, 1354, a judgment in a felony case should he arrested if the indictment he so defective that the nature and cause of the accusation is not clearly and fully stated. Cook v. State, 73 Miss., 517.</p> <p>3. Same. Malice.</p> <p>All indictments for felony must contain the averment that the act was committed with malice aforethought, or equivalent words, ’ otherwise the defect is fatal. Maxwell v. State, 68 Miss., 339; Jesse v. State, 38 Miss., 100.</p> <p>3. Same. Code 1893, g 1355. Malice.</p> <p>An indictment, under code 1893, g 1355, which fails to aver that the poison was mingled with intent maliciously to kill, etc., is defective. Malice must he charged of the intent to kill, etc.</p>
Judges: Stookdale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Westmoreland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 47×
- Taylor v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1952-05-12· cited 17×
- Herron v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1918-03-15· cited 11×
- Langford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1960-10-24· cited 5×
- Buchanan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1910-10-15· cited 3×
- Echoles v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 3×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.