Taylor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inconsistent testimony from other proceedings will not be considered for impeachment purposes on appeal when the inconsistencies were not raised at trial.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coleman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1983-09-19· cited 64×
• Pierce v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-02-05· cited 58×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sam v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-05-29· cited 40×
• Turman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-04-24· cited 39×
• Luckey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-12-11· cited 33×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-03-16· cited 27×
• William Anderson v. United States of America, Harold Moffett v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1969-03-10· cited 26×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1962-11-21· cited 23×
• McCart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1967-11-29· cited 19×
• Lehman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-06-17· cited 4×