Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 229 So. 3d 269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant had failed to preserve a claim challenging the sufficiency of the evidence in a revocation proceeding because he had not raised the claim in a postjudgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Windom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.