Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 9/9/2016
Taylor v. State
Citations
- 229 So. 3d 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the appellant had failed to preserve a claim challenging the sufficiency of the evidence in a revocation proceeding because he had not raised the claim in a postjudgment motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Windom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 2,882×
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 1,225×
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 2012-06-18· cited 994×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-03-21· cited 36×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-04-15· cited 31×
- Chenault v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-06-30· cited 25×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-01-31· cited 22×
- Goodrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-08-24· cited 14×
- Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2014-01-17· cited 9×
- Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-12-14· cited 8×
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-04-17· cited 4×
- Longmire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-12-28· cited 3×
- Quattlebaum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-08-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.