Taylor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a battery may be committed by the indirect application of force or the application of force indirectly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lamb v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-01· cited 85×
• Hardy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-22· cited 77×
• Schlossman v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-07· cited 26×
• Harrod v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-11-08· cited 17×
• Hickman v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-06-03· cited 15×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-03-05· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Burno
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1984-11-19· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Stratton
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1873-11-15· cited 52×
• Kirland v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1873-11-15· cited 30×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1951-06-14· cited 29×
• Yantz v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-06-15· cited 27×
• Ott v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-16· cited 26×
• Woods v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-03-07· cited 21×
• People v. Morgan
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-10-31· cited 16×
• Clark v. Downing
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1882-10-15· cited 12×
• Everhart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-03-07· cited 4×
• In Re Abbott
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1934-05-25· cited 3×
• State v. Mathewson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-07-06· cited 2×
• Ex parte Everhart
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1978-05-26· cited 2×
• In re Yantz
  Supreme Court· 1956-12-03· cited 1×