Indiana Supreme Court· 7/30/1985
Taylor v. State
Citations
- 480 N.E.2d 924
- 1985 Ind. LEXIS 921
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court stated that the decision of whether to strike panel members from the jury was a \judgment call on strategy that does not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel.\
- court stated that the decision of whether to strike panel members from the jury was a “judgment call on strategy that does not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel.”
- regarding waiver of voir dire issues
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Hunter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Robert Lee Goldsby v. William Harpole, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary, Parchman, MississippiFifth Circuit· 1959-03-17· cited 115×
- Elliott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-12· cited 54×
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-03-14· cited 47×
- Henderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-09-27· cited 29×
- Murphy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-05-01· cited 18×
- Boyle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1955-04-06· cited 14×
- Dixon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-11-20· cited 13×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 12×
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 10×
- Henson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-06-17· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.