Taylor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “essential element” of the crime of uttering a forged instrument is knowledge that the instrument was forged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Joseph M. Joyner
  D.C. Circuit· 1974-02-11· cited 7×
• Heath v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-08· cited 7×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-02-01· cited 4×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-12· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McDonald v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 62×
• Knowles v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1923-09-15· cited 21×
• Franklin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1913-10-28· cited 19×
• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 12×
• Winton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1924-02-13· cited 11×
• Lampley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-09-24· cited 10×
• Worster v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1921-12-17· cited 9×
• Graham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-12-23· cited 6×
• Schectman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-03-25· cited 4×