Taylor v. RAMSAY-GERDING CONSTRUCTION CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “holding that defendant was required to voice an objection to the court’s decision to remove that issue from the jury in order to avoid waiving the right to a jury trial of that issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Whitmore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-24· cited 24×
• Migis v. Autozone, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14· cited 18×
• State v. Ohotto
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-12· cited 10×
• Delgado v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-02· cited 6×
• AS 2014-11 5W LLC v. Caplan Landlord, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-23· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hitz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
• State v. Parkins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 123×
• Charles v. Palomo
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-19· cited 26×
• Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-11-06· cited 22×
• Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-20· cited 6×
• Precision Lumber Co. v. Martin Marietta Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-12-08· cited 2×