Taylor v. Kaufmann (In Re Kaufmann)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that contractor’s debt to homeowners did not fall within section 523(a)(6
• Those seeking exception to discharge under Section 523(a)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)
  N.D. Indiana· 1988-04-28· cited 105×
• Stevens v. Antonious (In Re Antonious)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-11-27· cited 66×
• Peterson v. Bozzano (In Re Bozzano)
  M.D. North Carolina· 1994-07-28· cited 58×
• Rezin v. Barr (In Re Barr)
  N.D. Illinois· 1996-04-03· cited 56×
• American Honda Finance Corp. v. Cilek (In Re Cilek)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1990-04-13· cited 50×
• Shaver Motors, Inc. v. Mills (In Re Mills)
  N.D. Indiana· 1988-12-29· cited 29×
• Deere v. Contella (In Re Contella)
  W.D. New York· 1994-04-14· cited 25×
• Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Watkins (In Re Watkins)
  E.D. Michigan· 1988-09-19· cited 21×
• Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. Pochel (In Re Pochel)
  C.D. Illinois· 1986-06-04· cited 19×
• Seery v. Basham (In Re Raymond)
  E.D. Virginia· 1989-10-06· cited 13×
• Whitson v. Middleton (In Re Middleton)
  E.D. Virginia· 1988-12-30· cited 12×
• Bohannon v. Horton (In Re Horton)
  W.D. Kentucky· 2007-07-27· cited 11×
• Cardenas v. Stowell (In Re Stowell)
  W.D. Texas· 1989-07-06· cited 10×
• Homemakers, Inc. v. Salamone (In Re Salamone)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-02-11· cited 9×
• Kadlecek v. Ferguson (In Re Ferguson)
  N.D. Illinois· 1998-07-24· cited 7×
• Taneff v. Hoehn (In Re Taneff)
  W.D. New York· 1996-01-03· cited 4×