Taylor v. Hull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following McEvoy to find that it “is not necessary that a dog attack a person who is injured; it is sufficient that the dog injures the party”
• construing an older, but substantially similar, version of the Illinois dog-bite statute
• construing an older, but substantially similar, version of the Illinois dog-bite statute
• jury question engendered and automobile motorist could recover from dog owner if dog trotted across road causing automobile to go out of control and overturn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Le Mars Mutual Insurance Co. of Iowa v. Bonnecroy
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-04-15· cited 28×
• Forsyth v. Dugger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-05-12· cited 25×
• McQueen v. Erickson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-11· cited 16×
• Chittum v. Evanston Fuel & Material Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-24· cited 16×
• Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-01-25· cited 12×
• Parikh v. Gilchrist
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-05· cited 8×
• King v. Ohren
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-18· cited 4×
• Lewellin Ex Rel. Lewellin v. Huber
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-06-26· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McEvoy v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1958-06-07· cited 30×
• Bailey v. Bly
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-11-01· cited 19×
• Aldridge v. Jensen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-06-04· cited 4×