· 11/1/1967
Bailey v. Bly
Citations
- 231 N.E.2d 8
- 87 Ill. App. 2d 259
- 1967 Ill. App. LEXIS 1277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no liability where the plaintiff tripped over a dog which was lying down
- finding no liability where the plaintiff tripped over a dog which was lying down
- the court refused to apply the statute to a woman who tripped over defendant’s dog, stating that there must be behavior on the part of the dog which caused injury and that liability may not be imposed “as pure penalty for dog ownership.” Id. at 262, 231 N.E.2d at 9
- the court refused to apply the statute to a woman who tripped over defendant's dog, stating that there must be behavior on the part of the dog which caused injury and that liability may not be imposed \as pure penalty for dog ownership.\ Id. at 262, 231 N.E.2d at 9
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craven, Smith, Trapp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.