Taylor v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The provisions of Rule 5A:20 are not jurisdictional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• M. Morgan Cherry & Associates, Ltd. v. Cherry
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-08-20· cited 49×
• Taylor v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2000-11-03· cited 32×
• United States v. Homaune
  District of Columbia· 2012-10-15· cited 25×
• Taylor v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-11-23· cited 13×
• M. Morgan Cherry & Associates, Ltd. v. Cherry
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-01-22· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Campbell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-05-14· cited 275×
• Branch v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-07-14· cited 210×
• Mejia v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-09-10· cited 33×
• Wilborn v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1959-04-03· cited 32×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-04-18· cited 30×
• McGill v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-05-20· cited 19×
• Bausell v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1935-09-19· cited 19×
• Diehl v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-10-24· cited 18×
• State v. Stocksdale
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-12-11· cited 13×
• State v. Donahue
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-02-09· cited 12×
• Goodwin v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-11-19· cited 9×
• State v. Butt
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-04-27· cited 9×