Goodwin v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a protective order was remedial and did not constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes
• concluding that a protective order was remedial and did not constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-11-24· cited 9×
• Hicks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2016-06-24· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• Martin v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-07-21· cited 959×
• Bridgeman v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-12-16· cited 239×
• Branch v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-07-14· cited 210×
• Diffendal v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-07-18· cited 91×
• Foster v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-12-10· cited 69×
• Small v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-11-20· cited 16×
• Small v. Com.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-01-04· cited 1×