Taylor v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s remedy is not to withhold discoverable materials, but to seek a protective order
• \A new trial based upon the prevailing party's misconduct does not require a showing the new evidence would have materially affected the outcome of the first trial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-09-16· cited 618×
• Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-04-03· cited 263×
• Matter of Firestorm 1991
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 62×
• In re Firestorm 1991
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 59×
• Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public Policy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-12-22· cited 57×
• Johnson v. Mermis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-18· cited 41×
• Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-31· cited 30×
• In the Matter of Estate of Foster
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-10-30· cited 26×
• Roberson v. Perez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-03· cited 15×
• Falk v. KEENE CORPORATION
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-17· cited 14×
• State v. Watkins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-06-10· cited 13×
• Hampson v. Ramer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-26· cited 9×
• Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 1×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-02· cited 1,365×
• Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-07-31· cited 451×
• State v. Case
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-06-07· cited 140×
• Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin
  Supreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 122×
• Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Thompson Mahogany Company (Third-Party Defendant)
  Third Circuit· 1961-06-20· cited 80×
• Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-23· cited 54×
• Nelson v. Mueller
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-03-27· cited 45×
• Levea v. G. A. Gray Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-03-28· cited 43×
• Warren v. Hart
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-06-29· cited 38×
• Keen v. Detroit Diesel Allison
  Tenth Circuit· 1978-04-03· cited 37×
• Nelson v. Martinson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1958-08-07· cited 36×
• Lampard v. Roth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-23· cited 27×
• Bunnell v. Barr
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-06-16· cited 18×
• Ralton v. Sherwood Logging Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1909-07-17· cited 18×
• Storey v. Storey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-09-26· cited 10×
• Barth v. Rock
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-10· cited 5×