Skip to main content
M.D. Alabama· 4/19/2000

Taylor v. Alabama

Citations

  • 95 F. Supp. 2d 1297
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5939
  • 2000 WL 530762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying 35 In Henry, the court reasoned: While the Eleventh Circuit has not resolved the specific question raised here, namely, whether an employee’s complaints about racial discrimination and a similar analysis
  • where a Title VII plaintiff names the employer as a defendant, any of the employer’s supervisory officials also named in the complaint may be dismissed from the action
  • “[T]he court is not required to, and need not, dismiss Plaintiff’s merged § 1981 claims. As explained in Godby [v. Montgomery County Board of Education, 996 F. Supp. 1390 (M.D. Ala. 1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Ment

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.