Ed Rich v. Larry C. Dollar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for immu- nity an official \must first prove that `he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly wrongful acts occurred.'\
• holding that Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 106 S.Ct. 1092, 89 L.Ed.2d 271 (1986) does not generally abrogate the normal qualified im munity standard articulated in Harlow and Mitchell absent some further showing.
• reversing denial of summary judgment where the district court relied on “assertions in the memorandum prepared by [] counsel”
• distinguishing between the issue of whether state attorney’s investigator had discretionary authority to prepare and submit probable cause affidavits and whether actual probable cause existed for the affidavit
• distinguishing between the issue of whether state attorney’s investigator had discretionary authority to prepare and submit probable cause affidavits and whether actual probable cause existed for the affidavit
• distinguishing between the issue of whether state attorney’s investigator had discretionary authority to prepare and submit probable cause affidavits and whether actual probable cause existed for the affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).