Skip to main content
· 11/13/2013

Tartt v. Wilson County

Citations

  • 982 F. Supp. 2d 810
  • 2013 WL 6009924
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding letter to benrishi privileged where “Japanese law would treat the [letter] as privileged” and where application of the privilege “would not be clearly inconsistent with important policies embodied in federal law” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.