· 11/13/2013
Tartt v. Wilson County
Citations
- 982 F. Supp. 2d 810
- 2013 WL 6009924
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding letter to benrishi privileged where “Japanese law would treat the [letter] as privileged” and where application of the privilege “would not be clearly inconsistent with important policies embodied in federal law” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.