Eleventh Circuit· 8/4/1998
Tannenbaum v. United States
Citations
- 148 F.3d 1262
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17876
- 1998 WL 438813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pleadings from pro se litigants are held to a less stringent standard than pleadings drafted by attorneys
- noting that although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, “issues not raised below are normally deemed waived”
- noting that although we are required to liberally construe pro se pleadings, issues not raised in the district court are generally deemed waived
- explaining that we hold pro se pleadings to a less stringent standard than those prepared by lawyers
- holding pro se pleadings to a “less stringent standard than pleadings drafted by attorneys” (emphasis added)
- explaining that issues not raised below, even by a pro se party, are normally deemed waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Godbold, Hill, Fay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bingham v. ThomasEleventh Circuit· 2011-09-02· cited 898×
- Ned Hughes v. Charles LottEleventh Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 832×
- Alba v. MontfordEleventh Circuit· 2008-02-22· cited 656×
- Miller v. DonaldEleventh Circuit· 2008-08-29· cited 602×
- United States v. PowellTenth Circuit· 1998-10-20· cited 296×
- Fred Dalton Brooks v. WardenEleventh Circuit· 2015-09-03· cited 285×
- Jameka K. Evans v. Georgia Regional HospitalEleventh Circuit· 2017-03-10· cited 147×
- Tonya Weinberg Gilmore v. Pam HodgesEleventh Circuit· 2013-12-20· cited 144×
- Francisco Gomez-Diaz v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2005-12-20· cited 138×
- Johnson v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2003-08-05· cited 128×
- Gerard Joseph Pugh v. Hugh SmithEleventh Circuit· 2006-09-29· cited 125×
- Thomas Bruce Henley v. Todd PayneEleventh Circuit· 2019-12-30· cited 105×
- Marie Patterson v. Georgia Pacific, LLCEleventh Circuit· 2022-07-05· cited 104×
- Rhode v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2009-09-29· cited 103×
- Cristobal D. Ramirez v. Secretary, U.S. Department of TransportationEleventh Circuit· 2012-07-12· cited 93×
- John Pinson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationEleventh Circuit· 2019-11-12· cited 83×
- Leon Carmichael, Sr. v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2020-07-22· cited 81×
- Solliday v. Federal OfficersEleventh Circuit· 2011-02-09· cited 77×
- Anthony Davila v. Robin GladdenEleventh Circuit· 2015-01-09· cited 76×
- Benon John Trawinski, Irene Monahan Trawinski v. United Technologies, Carrier CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2002-12-03· cited 69×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 7,499×
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 5,336×
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-08· cited 848×
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 586×
- Fernando Fernandez v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1991-09-18· cited 153×
- United States v. J.B. Farris, United States of America v. Jeffrey Bernard BushEleventh Circuit· 1996-03-13· cited 99×
- Farris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-10-07· cited 69×
- State v. ConsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-07-22· cited 44×
- Martin v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1996-04-26· cited 18×
- United States v. EverettEleventh Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 12×
Other cases named Tannenbaum v. United States
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.