Skip to main content
· 4/18/1974

Talps v. Arreola

Citations

  • 521 P.2d 206
  • 83 Wash. 2d 655
  • 1974 Wash. LEXIS 940

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was evident the appellant had abandoned a claim on appeal because she failed to include argument or cites to authority on the issue in her opening brief or in her reply brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.