Skip to main content
· 1/29/2015

In re the Estate of Wimberley

Citations

  • 186 Wash. App. 475
  • 349 P.3d 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “in determining legislative intent, all sections of a statute must be read together and in conjunction with each other, and construed with reference to the entire statute”
  • upholding statute granting standing to Civil Service Commission to enforce veterans' preferences where such standing did not exist under traditional standing doctrine
  • upholding statute granting standing to Civil Service Commission to enforce veterans’ preferences where such standing did not exist under traditional standing doctrine
  • analyzing statute more similar to former RCW 41.04.010 than the general veterans' preference statute, increasing exam points for veterans and specifically requiring \mandatory appointment preference\
  • explaining that the veterans’ preference policy outlined in the Commission’s management directive “reflect[s] the will of the legislature that veterans be given mandatory preference in appointment when their names appear together with those of non-veterans on a list of eligibles”
  • explaining that the veterans’ preference policy outlined in the Commission’s management directive “reflect[s] the will of the legislature that veterans be given mandatory preference in appointment when their names appear together with those of non-veterans on a list of eligibles”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Fearing, Siddoway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.