Skip to main content
· 6/26/1986

Talancon v. State

Citations

  • 721 P.2d 764
  • 102 Nev. 294
  • 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that this court will generally decline to consider issues raised for the first time in a reply brief
  • concluding that the unwanted grabbing of another's buttocks criminally offended community standards of decency, especially given that buttocks are \frequently sexualized in our society\
  • recognizing that this court declines to consider arguments not raised in an opening brief
  • \[W]e disagree with [appellant's] contention that double jeopardy prohibits his conviction for both felony- murder and the underlying felony.\
  • felony murder and assault with intent to commit rape
  • “[T]he felony murder statute seeks to protect against homicides.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.