D.C. Circuit· 8/25/1981
Tahan v. Hodgson
Citations
- 213 U.S. App. D.C. 306
- 662 F.2d 862
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that recognition of a judgment in U.S. court was no longer de-pendant on whether the foreign jurisdiction would recognize a U.S. judgment
- explaining that comity may not be granted to a foreign judgment if its recognition would be “repugnant to fundamental notices of what is decent and just”
- explaining Hilton’s relevance for the enforcement of foreign judgments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGowan, Wald, Wilkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World AirlinesD.C. Circuit· 1984-03-06· cited 238×
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineSecond Circuit· 1986-04-07· cited 211×
- Naoko Ohno v. Yuko YasumaNinth Circuit· 2013-07-02· cited 174×
- TermoRio S.A. E.S.P. v. Electranta S.P.D.C. Circuit· 2007-05-25· cited 134×
- David De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryD.C. Circuit· 2013-04-19· cited 130×
- Europcar Italia, S.P.A. v. Maiellano Tours, Inc.Second Circuit· 1998-09-02· cited 120×
- Phillips Usa, Inc. v. Allflex Usa, Inc., and N.J. Phillips Pty., LimitedTenth Circuit· 1996-02-26· cited 116×
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-07-17· cited 114×
- Gau Shan Company, Ltd. v. Bankers Trust CompanySixth Circuit· 1992-02-24· cited 71×
- Corporación Mexicana De Mantenimiento Integral v. Pemex-Exploración Y ProducciónSecond Circuit· 2016-08-02· cited 71×
- Turner Entertainment Co. v. Degeto Film GmbHEleventh Circuit· 1994-06-29· cited 48×
- Soberal-Perez v. HecklerSecond Circuit· 1983-08-30· cited 47×
- Evans Cabinet Corp. v. Kitchen International, Inc.First Circuit· 2010-02-03· cited 35×
- Syncrude Canada Ltd. v. Highland Consulting Group, Inc.D. Maryland· 2013-01-10· cited 32×
- Pariente v. Scott Meredith Literary Agency, Inc.S.D. New York· 1991-08-05· cited 26×
- In Re GerckeDistrict of Columbia· 1991-01-07· cited 23×
- Matusevitch v. TelnikoffDistrict of Columbia· 1995-01-27· cited 21×
- Nahar v. NaharDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-07· cited 21×
- Till Derr v. Thomas SwarekFifth Circuit· 2014-09-09· cited 21×
- Donnelly v. Federal Aviation AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-06-10· cited 20×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 984×
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court· 1917-03-06· cited 322×
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court· 1946-04-29· cited 294×
- Zschernig v. MillerSupreme Court· 1968-01-15· cited 270×
- Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1972-03-27· cited 244×
- Schroeder v. BusenhartSupreme Court· 1972-03-27· cited 128×
- Commonwealth v. OlivoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-11-10· cited 67×
- Direction Der Disconto-Gesellschaft v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1925-01-26· cited 65×
- Ingenohl v. Olsen & Co.Supreme Court· 1927-03-21· cited 39×
- Direction Der Disconto-Gesellschaft v. United States Steel Corp.S.D. New York· 1924-06-05· cited 35×
- Cowans v. Ticonderoga Pulp & Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1927-01-05· cited 24×
- Newton v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1909-10-22· cited 20×
- Julen v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-05-04· cited 16×
- Svenska Handelsbanken v. CarlsonD. Massachusetts· 1966-09-13· cited 13×
- Cherun v. FrishmanDistrict of Columbia· 1964-12-11· cited 12×
- Newton v. HuntNew York Supreme Court· 1908-06-15· cited 11×
- Bradstreet v. Neptune Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1839-10-15· cited 11×
- Sawyer v. Maine Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1815-05-15· cited 8×
- In re the Estate of RutherfurdNew York Surrogate's Court· 1944-02-02· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.