Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 8/25/1981

Tahan v. Hodgson

Citations

  • 213 U.S. App. D.C. 306
  • 662 F.2d 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that recognition of a judgment in U.S. court was no longer de-pendant on whether the foreign jurisdiction would recognize a U.S. judgment
  • explaining that comity may not be granted to a foreign judgment if its recognition would be “repugnant to fundamental notices of what is decent and just”
  • explaining Hilton’s relevance for the enforcement of foreign judgments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGowan, Wald, Wilkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.