Ingenohl v. Olsen & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trademark secured in one country “depend[s] for its protection” there and “confer[s] no rights” elsewhere
• enforcing Hong Kong judgment in trademark suit despite holding in Philippine lower court that Hong Kong judgment evidenced “clear mistake of law or fact”
• \A trademark started elsewhere would depend for its protection in Honkong upon the law prevailing in Honkong and would confer no rights except by the consent of that law.\
• \A trademark started elsewhere would depend for its protection in Hongkong upon the law prevailing in Hongkong and would confer no rights except by the consent of that law.\
• “Evidence of registration in other countries is not legally or factually relevant to potential customer percep- tion of Bayer’s analgesic goods in the United States.”
• not- ing that a trademark secured in one country “depend[s] for its protection” there and “confer[s] no rights” elsewhere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).