Taflinger Farm v. Uhl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an award of damages requested pursuant to Appellate 66(E) was not warranted where the challenge to the trial court’s judgment was supported with pertinent legal authority from which an argument could have been made
• noting that the appellant’s contentions were not utterly devoid of all plausibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).