S.D. New York· 10/30/2001
Tachiona v. Mugabe
Citations
- 169 F. Supp. 2d 259
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18712
- 2001 WL 1335003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Executive Branch’s role in determinations of head-of-state immunity was not affected by the passage of the FSIA.”
- “[T]he Executive Branch’s role in determinations of head-of-state immunity was not affected by the passage of the FSIA.”
- “With a legislative record devoid of any explicit contrary expression, a deliberate purpose to depart from generally prevalent international customs and practices as regards immunity for heads-of-state should not be ascribed to Congress.”
- “[C]ourts uniformly have accepted the claim [of immunity] as to heads-of-state and heads-of-government.”
- “[I]t ... would be an overstatement to say that Congress could have envisioned legislating to address a situation whose inherent problems, complexities and exact dimensions were not known or fully comprehended at the time.”
- “the ordeals of torture, extrajudicial killings and other atrocities which Plaintiffs assert characterized the campaign of lawlessness and terror ZANU-PF inflicted upon them fall within the ... violations of international law cognizable under the ATCA”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marrero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Lead Paint LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-06-15· cited 104×
- State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-07-01· cited 77×
- Doe v. Liu QiN.D. California· 2004-12-08· cited 62×
- Tachiona v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2004-10-06· cited 43×
- Al-Quraishi v. NakhlaD. Maryland· 2010-07-29· cited 33×
- Tachiona Ex Rel. Tachiona v. MugabeS.D. New York· 2002-02-14· cited 27×
- Doe v. Rafael SaraviaE.D. California· 2004-11-24· cited 22×
- Tachiona v. MugabeS.D. New York· 2002-12-11· cited 18×
- Chiminya Tachiona v. MugabeS.D. New York· 2002-08-07· cited 9×
- Abiola v. AbubakarN.D. Illinois· 2003-06-17· cited 9×
- United States v. KhobragadeS.D. New York· 2014-03-12· cited 7×
- Weixum v. XilaiDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-01· cited 2×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1982-06-25· cited 4,631×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court· 1997-05-27· cited 2,415×
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 1,835×
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,062×
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 984×
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 972×
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court· 1882-12-18· cited 854×
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court· 1989-04-18· cited 520×
- Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of CubaSupreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 428×
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court· 1897-11-29· cited 379×
- Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSupreme Court· 1982-06-15· cited 374×
- Dolly M. E. Filartiga and Joel Filartiga v. Americo Norberto Pena-IralaSecond Circuit· 1980-06-30· cited 367×
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 365×
- Hanoch Tel-Oren, in His Capacity as Father, on Behalf of the Deceased, Imry Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic Hanoch Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab RepublicD.C. Circuit· 1984-02-03· cited 311×
- The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. MarcosNinth Circuit· 1988-12-02· cited 279×
- Kolovrat v. OregonSupreme Court· 1961-05-01· cited 232×
- Hassan El-Fadl v. Central Bank of JordanD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-06· cited 208×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.