Skip to main content
· 4/30/2001

Syrett v. Reisner McEwin & Associates

Citations

  • 107 Wash. App. 524
  • 24 P.3d 1070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting exclusive contract because “[t]he very definition of a common carrier excludes the idea of the right to grant monopolies or to give special and unequal preferences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.