Nicodemus v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Hamm did not affect the validity of the legal principles set forth in Douglass regarding the enforceability of a policy limitation
• recognizing the rule that a contractual limitations provision is enforceable if reasonable and applying it to an insurance policy
• holding a two-year limitations period was unreasonable because there was no contractual basis for bringing the suit until after the limitations period had expired
• contractual limitations provision in an insurance policy is enforceable if it is reasonable
• contractual limitations provision in an insurance policy is enforceable if it is reasonable
• “The basic rule was established in Douglass-, a contractual limitations provision is enforceable if it is reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).